Powers v. Office of Child Support

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no analog between the activities of Office of Child Support and a private person
• finding no duty owed by employees of state agency to persons served by the agency
• affirming trial court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claims on sovereign immunity grounds
• Rule 12(b)(6) motion should not be granted “unless it is beyond doubt that there exist no facts or circumstances that would entitle [plaintiff] to relief’
• motion to dismiss should be granted only where “it is beyond doubt that there exist no facts or circumstances that would entitle [plaintiff] to relief”
• “What is alleged in [the] complaint is simple incompetence, inaccurate record keeping, and clerical errors. Such claims do not rise to the level of gross negligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).