McMullan v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was bound by terms of general release he executed in favor of defendants despite allegation that he did not read release because he did not have his glasses with him and despite claim that scope of the release had been misrepresented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).