McMichael v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where a separate writing is “made a part of the contract by annexation or 4 reference,” the writing will be construed as part of the contract
• “Although we do not hold that the introduction of such evidence violates the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment, we do hold that the considerations of fair play underlying the double jeopardy principle militate strongly against the evidence’s admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dorazio
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-09-02· cited 12×
• State of New Jersey v. J.M., Jr.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-11-21· cited 11×
• Felder v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-04-30· cited 10×
• Kimberly v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Barboza
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-02-05· cited 4×
• Honkanen v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-12-29· cited 3×
• Kelly v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 3×
• State of Tennessee v. Steve M. Jarman
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2020-07-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Little
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-03-30· cited 135×
• Donald M. Wingate v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida
  Fifth Circuit· 1972-07-25· cited 128×
• McMichael v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-04-07· cited 52×
• Jacobs v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-03-13· cited 34×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-16· cited 30×
• Stuart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-08· cited 28×
• State v. Kerwin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-06-03· cited 5×