Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/15/1999

McMath v. Katholi

Citations

711 N.E.2d 1135
304 Ill. App. 3d 369
238 Ill. Dec. 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a motion in limine is “by definition a pretrial motion,” and a ruling thereon is interlocutory (emphasis in original)
noting that a motion in limine is “by definition a pretrial motion,” and a ruling thereon is interlocutory (emphasis in original)
stating that any attempt to object to the testimony would have “made no - 15 - 1-10-0108 sense”
stating that any attempt to object to the testimony would have “ma[de] no sense”
purposes of Rule 213 are “elimination of surprise, expediting trial preparation, and improving discovery procedures”
jurors may testify about their exposure to extraneous information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.