Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 11/6/2002

McMahan v. Toto

Citations

  • 311 F.3d 1077
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23059
  • 2002 WL 31477305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing an award of attorney’s fees under § 768.79 and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442
  • “When [federal courts] write to a state law issue, we write in faint and disappearing ink.” (citation modified)
  • absent a state supreme court decision, we generally follow state intermediate-appellate court decisions on issues of state law
  • “Two is a majority of three, and a majority of participating judges controls a court’s decision.”
  • “[W]hen [federal courts] write to a state law issue, we write in faint and disappearing ink.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • affirming finding that $100 offer was made in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Hand, Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.