Skip to main content
· 7/10/2003

Waymark Corporation and Caravello Family Lp, and Joseph J. Zito and Alexander B. Rotbart, Sanctioned Parties-Appellants v. Porta Systems Corporation

Citations

  • 334 F.3d 1358
  • 67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1303
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13860
  • 2003 WL 21544410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the validity of parties’ argument that there was an alleged exclusive license
  • stating that, under appropriate circumstances, “[l]icenses may be oral”
  • an oral licensee could properly join patent suit by partnering with holder of written assignment of patent
  • “Only assignments need be in writing under 35 U.S.C. § 261. Licenses may be oral.”
  • “[A] district court must be careful not to award sanctions based on a misunder- standing of the governing law, and we must carefully re- view an award of sanctions to ensure that this has not occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Rader, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.