· 7/10/2003
Waymark Corporation and Caravello Family Lp, and Joseph J. Zito and Alexander B. Rotbart, Sanctioned Parties-Appellants v. Porta Systems Corporation
Citations
- 334 F.3d 1358
- 67 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1303
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13860
- 2003 WL 21544410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the validity of parties’ argument that there was an alleged exclusive license
- stating that, under appropriate circumstances, “[l]icenses may be oral”
- an oral licensee could properly join patent suit by partnering with holder of written assignment of patent
- “Only assignments need be in writing under 35 U.S.C. § 261. Licenses may be oral.”
- “[A] district court must be careful not to award sanctions based on a misunder- standing of the governing law, and we must carefully re- view an award of sanctions to ensure that this has not occurred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Rader, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.