Supreme Court· 4/3/2017

McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n

Citations

581 U.S. 72
137 S. Ct. 1159
197 L. Ed. 2d 500
26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 523
85 U.S.L.W. 4188
2017 WL 1199454
2017 U.S. LEXIS 2327
101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,765
129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that abuse of discretion review gives the decisionmaker a “‘wide range of a choice’” and serves to provide a certain amount of insulation from appellate review “for functional reasons”
“[A] district court’s decision to enforce an EEOC subpoena should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.”
“[C]ourts should pay ‘great deference’ to a magistrate judge’s determination of probable cause.” (quoting Gates, 462 U.S. at 236)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sonia Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.