McKinnon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \harassment\ element of crime of stalking requires State to prove defendant's acts caused substantial emotional distress, not that defendant intended to cause substantial emotional distress
• holding that the \harassment\ element of crime of stalking requires State to prove defendant's acts caused substantial emotional distress, not that defendant intended to cause substantial emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cliett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26· cited 6×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-27· cited 2×
• Fernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-16· cited 1×
• Sullivan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-30
• Cheveon Alonzo Ford v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-06-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pallas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-03· cited 53×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-29· cited 35×
• Wiggins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-03-18· cited 17×
• In Interest of TMM
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-11· cited 17×