Court of Appeals of Georgia· 5/9/2001
McKinney v. State
Citations
- 549 S.E.2d 164
- 250 Ga. App. 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Any prejudice which results merely from the passage of time cannot create the requisite prejudice. The possibilities that memories will dim [and that] witnesses [will] become inaccessible! ] are not in themselves enough to demonstrate that [a defendant] cannot receive a fair trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mikell, Blackburn, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-01-18· cited 22×
- Stanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-10-29· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-03-19· cited 5×
- Brannen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-08-12· cited 5×
- Lamar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-08-13· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-01-24· cited 143×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-09-22· cited 66×
- Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 44×
- Nealy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-09· cited 18×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-01· cited 17×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-07-06· cited 14×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-14· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.