Hall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court didnot abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance to allow defense counsel more time to prepare for trial
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance so that his trial counsel could have more time to prepare for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Redding
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-03-11· cited 52×
• Robbins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-20· cited 32×
• Nealy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-09· cited 18×
• State v. Sutton
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-04-21· cited 10×
• Taylor v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-11· cited 8×
• Hartley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-01· cited 6×
• McKinney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-05-09· cited 5×
• Gilbert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-01-29· cited 3×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-14

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Barnes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-03-02· cited 180×
• Boseman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-01-24· cited 143×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-09-22· cited 66×
• Perry v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-11-07· cited 54×
• Snow v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-24· cited 13×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-13· cited 8×
• Weidlund v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-05-24· cited 7×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-02-23· cited 6×