McKinney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing whether evidence claimed to be the result of a defective search warrant was the fruit of the poisonous tree
• the question is “whether, granting establishment of the primary illegality, the evidence to which instant objection is made has been come at by exploitation of that illegality or instead by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• St. Fleur v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-04· cited 20×
• McGrath v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-01· cited 15×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-09· cited 13×
• Stanley R. Chesney v. State of Mississippi
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-05-19· cited 12×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-12-01· cited 9×
• Michael Rossman Rice v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-01-06
• Durwin Logan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-03-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-07-06· cited 90×
• Ruffin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-10-29· cited 47×
• Larochelle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-01-05· cited 23×
• Winter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-12-06· cited 13×
• Patel v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-09-28· cited 6×