Larochelle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence authorized jury to find both defendants were in knowing joint or constructive possession of cocaine concealed in secret compartment
• “[T]he existence of a prior indictment generally is not grounds for quashing the second indictment, although the state may be required to elect upon which indictment it will proceed.”
• no presumption of vindictiveness after the defendant filed a motion to suppress and other pretrial demands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).