McKinney v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in determining whether an absence was voluntary, \it is proper to tailor the requirements as to proof to the realities of the situation\
• in determining whether an absence was voluntary, “it is proper to tailor the requirements as to proof to the realities of the situation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donta v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1993-07-23· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. B.J.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2007-12-20· cited 9×
• Finney v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1982-08-06· cited 5×
• Burns v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1983-07-08· cited 1×
• Com. v. BJ
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2007-12-20
• William Sloss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2024-10-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. Zerbst
  Supreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• Duncan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
• Illinois v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
• Butcher v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1955-03-11· cited 4×
• Willock v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1968-06-14· cited 4×
• Fleming v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1955-05-27· cited 2×
• Helton v. Stivers
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1965-07-02· cited 2×