Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/6/1998

McKenzie v. State

Citations

583 N.W.2d 744
1998 Minn. LEXIS 558
1998 WL 460146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that judges presiding over related criminal cases could consult with each other in private to discuss potential issues related to these cases as long as the judges did not predetermine a ruling before hearing and considering the parties’ arguments
explaining that arguments “allude[d] to” in a brief are waived when the party “fail[ed] to address them in the argument portion” of the brief
declining to address issues that the appellant alluded to but failed to address in the argument portion of his brief
applying the rule that arguments not briefed are waived when appellant alluded to issues but “fail[ed] to address them in the argument portion of his brief”
noting that issues not briefed on appeal are waived
applying the rule that arguments not briefed are forfeited in a case where appellant “allude[d] to” an issue but “fail[ed] to address [it] in the argument portion of his brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tomljanovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.