McKenzie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]efaming and libelous speech ‘can, consistent with the First Amendment, be regulated because of their constitutionally proscribable content.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grady v. UNIFIED GOV'T OF ATHENS-CLARKE
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-09-12· cited 17×
• Briggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-11-29· cited 10×
• Final Exit Network, Inc. v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-02-06· cited 8×
• WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-31· cited 2×
• L. LIN WOOD v. NICOLE WADE
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-02-04
• David Gaines Gilmore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-10-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• R. A. v. v. City of St. Paul
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
• Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
• City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 1,058×
• United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 958×
• Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 624×
• Cunningham v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-02-22· cited 24×
• Constantino v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-05-02· cited 21×
• Chambers v. Peach County
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-03-04· cited 14×
• I.D.K., Inc. v. Ferdinand
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-02-02· cited 2×