Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/22/1991
Cunningham v. State
Citations
- 400 S.E.2d 916
- 260 Ga. 827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that fighting words are one of the categories of speech that does not “raise constitutional problems provided that the statutes regulating them are narrowly drawn”
- explaining that if a statute, such as one criminalizing the use of fighting words, “affects protected speech,” Georgia courts, in reviewing whether the statute is constitutional, must first determine if it is narrowly tailored to protect some vital government interest
- finding a Georgia statute which banned profane language on bumper stickers to be unconstitutional
- recognizing First Amendment implications of underinclusive statute
- before considering whether statute that affects protected speech is overbroad, it must be determined if it can be narrowly construed by this Court
- before considering whether statute that affects protected speech is overbroad, it must be determined if it can be narrowly construed by this Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarke, Smith, Weltner, Bell, Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Union City Board of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-03-11· cited 45×
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-05· cited 24×
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-02-28· cited 18×
- Christensen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-03-11· cited 16×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-08· cited 13×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-07-06· cited 12×
- Briggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-11-29· cited 10×
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-04-26· cited 9×
- State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-05-26· cited 8×
- Final Exit Network, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-02-06· cited 8×
- Knowles v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-02-21· cited 5×
- WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELLSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-31· cited 2×
- Baker v. GloverM.D. Alabama· 1991-10-03· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 1,516×
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 1,392×
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 1,301×
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,124×
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 1,079×
- Bethel School District No. 403 v. FraserSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 857×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 761×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-12-05· cited 66×
- Holcombe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1908-10-26· cited 37×
- City of MacOn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-09-06· cited 12×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-11-20· cited 11×
- Sarnie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-04-08· cited 9×
- Hartrampf v. Georgia Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-29· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.