Skip to main content

Cunningham v. State

Citations

  • 400 S.E.2d 916
  • 260 Ga. 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that fighting words are one of the categories of speech that does not “raise constitutional problems provided that the statutes regulating them are narrowly drawn”
  • explaining that if a statute, such as one criminalizing the use of fighting words, “affects protected speech,” Georgia courts, in reviewing whether the statute is constitutional, must first determine if it is narrowly tailored to protect some vital government interest
  • finding a Georgia statute which banned profane language on bumper stickers to be unconstitutional
  • recognizing First Amendment implications of underinclusive statute
  • before considering whether statute that affects protected speech is overbroad, it must be determined if it can be narrowly construed by this Court
  • before considering whether statute that affects protected speech is overbroad, it must be determined if it can be narrowly construed by this Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke, Smith, Weltner, Bell, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.