Skip to main content

McKenzie v. McKenzie

Citations

  • 672 So. 2d 48
  • 1996 WL 90577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that twelve-month delay required new trial where inconsistencies in judgment indicated the trial court may not have recalled the evidence
  • reversing a judgment entered a year after the final hearing and remanding for a new trial because \[i]nconsistencies in the final judgment suggest that the trial judge may not have recalled the evidence presented at the hearing\
  • reversing a final judgment of dissolution of marriage where “[ijnconsistencies in the final judgment suggested] that the trial judge may not have recalled the evidence presented at the hearing,” which occurred a year before the entry of the final judgment
  • holding one-year delay in ruling unreasonable
  • holding one-year delay in ruling unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.