Skip to main content
· 5/26/1999

Donn v. Donn

Citations

  • 733 So. 2d 581
  • 1999 WL 332563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing based upon inconsistencies between judgment and evidence presented at trial, together with a ten-month delay found to be excessive
  • reversing for a new trial after a ten-month delay because there were numerous inconsistencies between the terms of the final judgment and the facts presented at the final hearing, and because the trial judge failed to make pertinent findings regarding alimony
  • ten month delay and no findings in the judgment supporting alimony award required new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.