Skip to main content
First Circuit· 10/18/2017

McKee v. Cosby

Citations

  • 874 F.3d 54
  • 2017 WL 4675588
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that these First Amendment safeguards are “[s]uperimposed on any state’s defamation law”
  • noting that these First Amendment safeguards are “[s]uperimposed on any state’s defamation law”
  • finding letter nonactionable because it “adequately disclosed the non-defamatory facts underlying [defendant’s] assertions,” including “citations to articles and other sources” and “extensive underlying facts”
  • describing the Restatement as “an ‘obvious source of guidance’ for choice of law questions.” (quoting Bushkin Assocs. v. Raytheon Co., 473 N.E.2d 662, 668 (Mass. 1985))
  • potentially derogatory statements published with detailed backup as to foundation for belief not actionable
  • “Superimposed on any state's defamation law are First Amendment safeguards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Stahl, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named McKee v. Cosby

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.