McGriff v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The right of a criminal defendant to confront the witnesses against him ... is not absolute . . . and does not require that every witness testify in court in front of the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Foster
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-06-11· cited 113×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-02-08· cited 42×
• McGriff v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-09-07· cited 17×
• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-02-26· cited 13×
• State v. Hearn
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1997-04-04
• Roberson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2026-04-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maryland v. Craig
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
• Delaware v. Fensterer
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
• Coy v. Iowa
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
• Tucker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-11· cited 23×
• Feleke v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-02-05· cited 19×
• State v. Krick
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1993-12-16· cited 3×