Skip to main content

McGill v. State

Citations

  • 18 P.3d 77
  • 2001 Alas. App. LEXIS 35
  • 2001 WL 114246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s instruction that consent could be withdrawn after the initial penetration
  • affirming the trial court's instruction that consent could be withdrawn after the initial penetration
  • when the applicable law can be reasonably disputed, there is no plain error
  • “Our statutes do not limit ‘sexual penetration’ to the moment of initial penetration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.