Skip to main content

McFarland v. State

Citations

  • 989 S.W.2d 749
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
  • 1999 WL 155720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in order to preserve error for review, an appellant must object to improper jury argument
  • addressing “second” argument to which objection was overruled, but holding that first, third, and fourth arguments were not preserved where the objection was sustained but not pursued to adverse ruling
  • failure to request instruction to disregard or mistrial failed to preserve any error in prosecutor’s jury argument
  • failure to request instruction to disregard or mistrial failed to preserve any error in prosecutor’s jury argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Womack, Keasler, Holland, Johnson, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.