McFadden v. Ten-T Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contractor \`is justified in relying upon the adequacy of the specifications unless they are so obviously dangerous that no competent contractor would follow them'\
• holding that a contractor, a builder , could be held liable for negligently widening and resurfacing a highway and that the contractor was not insulated from liability by the owner's acceptance of the contractor's work
• \a defendant will not be relieved from liability merely on the basis of lack of privity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).