McFadden v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in order to render a transfer preferring the debtor’s father void, the other creditor would need “to show fraud, or knowledge of the fraud, on the part of the mortgagee”
• “The son had a right to prefer his father, and secure the debt due him. Whether his father was at that time demanding payment of it or not would make no difference. The son was owing him a bona fide debt, and he executed a note for the amount, and a mortgage on his goods, securing it_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hoesman v. Sheffler
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-05-20· cited 13×
• Fuller & Fuller Co. v. Mehl
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1893-03-11· cited 13×
• McFadden v. Ross
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1895-10-18· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• O'Donald v. Constant
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1882-05-15· cited 31×
• Fisher v. Syfers
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1887-02-16· cited 27×
• First National Bank v. Carter
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-15· cited 14×
• Willis v. Thompson
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1884-01-24· cited 10×