McDougal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one cannot challenge a statute “on the ground that it may conceivably be applied in hypothetical situations not before the court”
• one cannot challenge a statute “on the ground that it may conceivably be applied in hypothetical situations not before the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bailey v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-07-09· cited 56×
• Short v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-27· cited 40×
• Robert D. Holloway, Inc. v. Pine Ridge Addition Residential Property Owners
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-04-09· cited 27×
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-12-03· cited 23×
• Adkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2007-10-04· cited 20×
• Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Murders
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-03-03· cited 14×
• Smith v. Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corp.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-05-27· cited 3×
• Ralph Loyd Martin Revocable Trust Declaration Dated The First Day of April 1994 v. Arkansas Midstream Gas Services Corp.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-12-09· cited 3×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2001-11-16
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2005-12-22
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 2005-03-09