Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Murders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to address the issue of standing as to whether appellee hunters had standing to assert the rights of nonhunters because the matter was not raised below and the issue did not involve the court’s jurisdiction
• refusing to address a challenge to subject-matter jurisdiction based on a lack of standing that was raised for the first time on appeal, because a “lack of standing does not deprive a court of jurisdiction,” citing Carriage Creek, supra
• “The issue of whether appel-lees, who are all hunters, have standing to assert the rights of non-hunters, was not raised at the trial court level. Consequently, we do not discuss this issue on appeal, as lack of standing does not deprive a court of jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).