Skip to main content

McDonald's Corp. v. Levine

Citations

  • 439 N.E.2d 475
  • 108 Ill. App. 3d 732
  • 64 Ill. Dec. 224
  • 1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 2697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 14 — 6 of the Eavesdropping Act, which lists three civil remedies available for violations thereunder — injunctive relief and actual and punitive damages — is not a statutory penalty
  • stating that a statutory penalty “imposes automatic liability for a violation of its terms and the amount of liability is predetermined by the act and imposed without actual damages suffered by the plaintiff”
  • section 2-619(a)(3) dismissal proper where \the very use of certain evidence in the first case was the violation charged in the second case\
  • even if eavesdropping claim was actually a claim for intrusion upon seclusion, the one-year statute of limitations of what is now section 13—201 would not apply to plaintiffs’ cause of action because intrusion upon seclusion requires publication
  • even if eavesdropping claim was actually a claim for intrusion upon seclusion, the one-year statute of limitations of what is now section 13--201 would not apply to plaintiffs’ cause of action because intrusion upon seclusion requires publication
  • interpreting what is now section 13 — 202

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.