Benitez v. KFC National Management Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• poking holes in ceiling of women’s restroom and viewing plaintiffs is sufficient intrusion upon seclusion claim
• construing Thomas v. Pearl, 998 F.2d 447, 452 (7th Cir. 1993
• “[e]xamples of actionable intrusion upon seclusion would include invading someone’s home, illegally searching someone’s shopping bag in a store, eavesdropping by wiretapping, peering into the windows of a private home, or making persistent and unwanted telephone calls”
• videotaping of medical examination found to be “highly offensive” behavior
• “The fact that publication is not an element of intrusion upon seclusion is crucial, since the plain language of section 13-201 indicates that the one-year statute of limitations governs only libel, slander and privacy torts involving publication … ”
• spying on plaintiff in a restroom facility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).