McDonald v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming admission of testimonial evidence because court held permissible to do so under Ark. R. Evid. 404(b), not simply because evidence might have been cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ayers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-09-17· cited 59×
• Hogue v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-02-19· cited 11×
• Box v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-06-06· cited 5×
• Pickett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-12-18· cited 3×
• Davies v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-11-04· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pilcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-10-15· cited 38×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-07-09· cited 28×
• Hutcherson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-12-12· cited 24×
• Andrews v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-04-22· cited 21×
• Mitchell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-09-11· cited 15×
• Gonzalez v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-06-10· cited 12×
• Cantrell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-03-05· cited 10×
• Aaron v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-09-18· cited 10×
• Baldridge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1990-11-07· cited 9×
• Campbell v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-11-13· cited 6×
• Garrison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1985-01-16· cited 5×
• Maynard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1987-04-22· cited 5×