McDaniels v. McDaniels
Citations
- 5 Alaska 107
Syllabus
<p>Divoece <&wkey;22—Marriage <&wkey;20(l).</p> <p>About November 15, 1910, defendant procured a marriage license from the authorities at Vancouver, B. C., authorizing the plaintiff and defendant to intermarry. Plaintiff was a woman of foreign birth, unfamiliar with the English language and customs. She was informed by the defendant that said paper or marriage license was all the formality or ceremony necessary to constitute marriage. Plaintiff agreed with the defendant to become his wife, and they resided together, openly and notoriously, as husband and wife from that time till this suit was brought for divorce. Held, the parties were married by contract or common-law marriage, and that the plaintiff was entitled to the divorce prayed for.</p> <p>cgx^oSee same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court· 1884-12-15· cited 153×
- Inhabitants of Milford v. Inhabitants of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1810-09-15· cited 37×
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1872-12-15· cited 19×
- Hargroves v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court· 1856-04-15· cited 18×
- Mathewson v. Phœnix Iron FoundryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island· 1884-05-20· cited 9×
- Mattoon v. McGrewSupreme Court· 1884-12-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.