McCoy v. State
Citations
- 44 Tex. 616
Syllabus
<p>1. Theft—Charge of court.—A charge of the court enumerating the principal circumstances in evidence relied on as proof of recent possession of the property stolen, and instructing the jury “that the law raises from them, if unexplained, the presumption of guilt,” is error, for which a new trial should have been granted.</p> <p>2. Recent possession of stolen property.—Such possession, if unexplained, is a fact to be taken with the other testimony, from all which the jury may infer guilt as a presumption of fact, not of law. Any interference with the right of the jury in drawing their own conclusions from the testimony is error.</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarrettaUtah Supreme Court· 1916-01-29· cited 29×
- Hannah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Alderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Irvine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-02-21
- J. F. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1884-05-07
- York v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1885-01-28
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.