Martinez v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 164
Syllabus
<p>1. Theft of money.—An indictment for thoft of “one hundred and eighty-two dollars in United States currency” is defective for want of sufficient description of the property stolen and of averment of its value.</p> <p>2. Charge to jury.—It is error to instruct the jury in a case of theft. and upon proof of recent possession of the stolen property, that they should find the defendant guilty, unless such possession be fairly and reasonably explained.</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McCoy v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 13×
- State v. OakleySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1888-11-15· cited 6×
- Lavarre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Sansbury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1879-07-01
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.