Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 41 Tex. 164

Syllabus

<p>1. Theft of money.—An indictment for thoft of “one hundred and eighty-two dollars in United States currency” is defective for want of sufficient description of the property stolen and of averment of its value.</p> <p>2. Charge to jury.—It is error to instruct the jury in a case of theft. and upon proof of recent possession of the stolen property, that they should find the defendant guilty, unless such possession be fairly and reasonably explained.</p>

Judges: Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.