California Court of Appeal· 5/14/2013
McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.
Citations
- 216 Cal. App. 4th 283
- 2013 D.A.R. 6115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- FEHA protects against “ultimate employment actions such as termination” (quotation 9 marks and citation omitted)
- termination of an employment is a quintessential example of an adverse employment action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Light v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-08-08· cited 89×
- Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 88×
- Mendoza v. Western Medical Center Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-01-14· cited 23×
- Buckner v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2013-12-20· cited 9×
- Trulsson v. County of San Joaquin District Attorney's OfficeE.D. California· 2014-09-23· cited 1×
- Light v. Calif. Dept. of Parks and RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-08-08
- Lacagnina v. Comprehend Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2018-08-03
- Alexander v. Community Hospital of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-03-10
- Ford v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-04-01
- Khoiny v. Dignity HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-03-16
- Howell v. State Dept. of State HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2024-12-05
- Lowry v. Port San Luis Harbor Dist.California Court of Appeal· 2025-02-26
- Yan v. City of Diamond BarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2026-03-11
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 838×
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court· 2008-02-26· cited 584×
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-07-02· cited 546×
- Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-07-18· cited 379×
- Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court· 2009-11-30· cited 339×
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 334×
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-12-19· cited 293×
- Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 251×
- Fisher v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-10-02· cited 250×
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-08-30· cited 205×
- Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-04-01· cited 192×
- Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2009-03-05· cited 171×
- Rufo v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-26· cited 155×
- Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court· 1971-03-24· cited 154×
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-11-24· cited 154×
- McRae v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-08-29· cited 130×
- Gillan v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-02-21· cited 129×
- Lily Spencer, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/crossThird Circuit· 2006-11-22· cited 124×
- Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2005-04-05· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.