Skip to main content

McConnell v. State

Citations

  • 540 N.E.2d 100
  • 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 501
  • 1989 WL 72396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In our opinion, Officer Lewis’s testimony that the substance appeared to be marijuana was sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer that the substance was marijuana[.]”
  • “In our opinion, Officer Lewis’s testimony that the substance appeared to be marijuana was sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer that the substance was marijuana[.]”
  • expert testimony that paraphernalia contained drug residue was sufficient to establish intent
  • expert testimony that paraphernalia contained drug residue sufficient to establish intent
  • expert testimony that paraphernalia contained drug residue sufficient to establish intent
  • presence of marijuana residue on marijuana pipe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Ratliff, Shields

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.