Skip to main content

Cooper v. State

Citations

  • 357 N.E.2d 260
  • 171 Ind. App. 350
  • 92 A.L.R. 3d 36
  • 1976 Ind. App. LEXIS 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in order in to sustain a conviction for possession of instruments adapted to the use of narcotics, the State must prove that the defendant was in possession of the instruments and had the intent to use them illegally
  • “The statute under which Cooper was convicted makes no mention of an amount of drug necessary to sustain a conviction. It is reasonable to conclude, then, that the legislature intended that any identifiable amount be sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchanan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.