McColly v. Brunelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that privilege logs typically require “information regarding the nature of the privilege/protection claimed, the name of the person making/receiving the communication, the date and place of the communication, and the document's general subject matter.”
• describing the multi-step process for “properly assert[ing]” privilege through a privilege log
• describing the multi-step process for “properly assert[ing]” privilege through a privilege log
• “[T]his case does not present an instance of a single document slipping through the cracks.”
• “In camera review, however, can be an enormous burden on the court, about which the parties and their attorneys often seem to be blissfully unconcerned.”
• “[W]hen a party refuses to produce documents during discovery on the basis that they are privileged or protected, it has a duty to particularize that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).