McClesky v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “submission and consideration of post- hearing evidence are common in social security disability cases . . . since the claimant has no clue to what the vocational expert will testify until the end of the hearing”
• describing DOT as “the Bible of vocational experts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).