McCarthy v. Johnson

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3429

Syllabus

Municipal court did not abuse its discretion by denying objections to magistrate's decision based on admission of duplicate documents into evidence because appellant failed to demonstrate genuine questions as to the authenticity of the original documents. Municipal court also did not abuse its discretion by denying objections to magistrate's decision based on erroneous application of R.C. 1302.05 to a dispute that did not involve a transaction in goods where the court found the error to be harmless because the common law parol evidence rule would have applied in the same manner and appellant failed to challenge the court's harmless error finding. Municipal court did not abuse its discretion by denying objections to magistrate's decision based on alleged erroneous factual finding, where the allegedly erroneous factual finding appeared to have been a typographical error.