Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/25/2021

In re A.R.

Citations

2021 Ohio 1794

Syllabus

The manifest weight of the evidence supports the trial court's conclusion that (1) the child could not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time or should not be placed with either parent, and (2) a grant of permanent custody to the public children services agency was in the child's best interest.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Dell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-19· cited 6×
In re C.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-13· cited 2×
In re M.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-18
In re A.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
In re D.A.
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 172×
In re M.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-05· cited 20×
In re H.H.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-03· cited 8×
McCarthy v. Johnson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-23· cited 5×
Saha v. Research Inst. at Nationwide Childrens Hosp.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.