Skip to main content

McCallum v. State

Citations

  • 686 S.W.2d 132
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a conviction in which a litigant bought champagne for a juror because there was insufficient evidence that the benefit was “in exchange for or in consideration of her vote as a juror”
  • reversing a conviction in which a litigant bought champagne for a juror because there was insufficient evidence that the benefit was “in exchange for or in consideration of her vote as a juror”
  • proof of a bilateral agreement required where indictment only alleged a single theory of bribery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.