District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/18/2005
McBride v. State
Citations
- 913 So. 2d 696
- 2005 WL 2649204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a criminal defendant has a due process right to present evidence and that exclusion of evidence for a defense discovery violation should be imposed only if no other remedy suffices
- holding that a criminal defendant has a due process right to present evidence and that exclusion of evidence for a defense discovery violation should be imposed only if no other remedy suffices
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-12-03· cited 173×
- Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-10-14· cited 72×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-27· cited 28×
- Weston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-31· cited 23×
- Henry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-25· cited 12×
- Gardner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.