McALPHIN v. TONEY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s allegation that a spreading infection in his mouth constituted an imminent danger of serious physical injury
• finding that the plaintiff’s allegation of a spreading mouth infection, caused by two delayed tooth extractions, was sufficient to show imminent serious danger
• holding that a spreading infection fits the bill
• finding plaintiff faced imminent danger where infection spreading in his mouth required five tooth extractions and he needed two more extractions that were being unconstitutionally delayed
• finding plaintiff faced imminent danger where infection spreading in his mouth required five tooth extractions and he needed two more extractions that were being unconstitutionally delayed
• finding allegations about prison’s failure 11 to provide tooth extraction sufficient to meet imminent danger requirement when delay 12 previously allowed infection to spread in inmate’s mouth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).