MAZCleveland, L.L.C. v. Hall
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1196
Syllabus
Motion for sanctions; frivolous conduct; post-judgment motion; R.C. 2323.51. - Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants' post-judgment motion for sanctions, arguing that appellee's counsel filed the complaint knowing that it would be frivolous. The conduct was not egregious, nor does it matter that appellee was ultimately unsuccessful. A hearing is not required on a post-judgment motion for sanctions where the record does not clearly evidence frivolous conduct.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State ex rel. DiFranco v. S. Euclid (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-12-02· cited 74×
- Ohio Power Co. v. OgleOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-19· cited 25×
- Lakeview Holding (OH), L.L.C. v. HaddadOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-02· cited 9×
- D.L.M. v. D.J.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.