Mayo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[p]lainly, article 35.29 is intended to protect jurors by keeping their addresses and other personal information confidential in the absence of a trial court order
• stating that “[p]lainly, article 35.29 is intended to protect jurors by keeping their addresses and other personal information confidential in the absence of a trial court order
• stating that A [p]lainly, article 35.29 is intended to protect jurors by keeping their addresses and other personal information confidential in the absence of a trial court order
• statement of Mr. Chris Elliott, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's Ass'n
• statement of Mr. Tom Crumpett, District County Attorneys Ass'n

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roise v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-02· cited 252×
• Mayo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 58×
• Sheldon Wayne Oku v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-10-07
• Vicki Largent Minze A/K/A Vicki Hackney Minze A/K/A Vicki Hackney Largent A/K/A Vicki Hackney v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-03-18
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2001-08-28
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2001-07-02
• Almanza v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-07-12