Mayes v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Congress also set out “to prevent loans from being conditioned automatically on the securing of the signature of the non-borrowing spouse.”
• “[The husband] has no claim for damages or injunctive relief under ECOA for harm done to his wife. If anyone was injured by requiring [the wife] to sign the guarantee, it was she and not [the husband], who after all received the loan he had sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).