Mayes v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Congress also set out “to prevent loans from being conditioned automatically on the securing of the signature of the non-borrowing spouse.”
• “[The husband] has no claim for damages or injunctive relief under ECOA for harm done to his wife. If anyone was injured by requiring [the wife] to sign the guarantee, it was she and not [the husband], who after all received the loan he had sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-08-28· cited 36×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry S. Fischl v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-08-31· cited 70×
• Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. Freeman
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-11-29· cited 39×
• Bolduc v. Beal Bank, SSB
  First Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 31×
• Chrysler Credit v. Silva, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1994-10-11· cited 13×
• Boatmen's First Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. Koger
  D. Kansas· 1992-02-27· cited 8×

Other cases named Mayes v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mayes v. Chrysler Credit Corp
  First Circuit· 1999-01-28