Skip to main content
· 11/29/1993

Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. Freeman

Citations

  • 839 F. Supp. 326
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16695
  • 1993 WL 515455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing an action by way of recoupment, which essentially functions as a defense, will lie where a party possesses an otherwise time-barred ECOA claim
  • stating “a creditor may not claim legal reliance on a signature that was illegally required in the first instance”
  • stating “a creditor may not claim legal reliance on a signature that was illegally required in the first instance”
  • \Claims by way of recoupment are 'never barred by the statute of limitations so long as the main action itself is timely'\
  • party could assert time-barred claim by way of recoupment in action by lender to collect on guaranty
  • applicant may seek only recoupment damages after limitations period has run

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.