· 11/29/1993
Integra Bank/Pittsburgh v. Freeman
Citations
- 839 F. Supp. 326
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16695
- 1993 WL 515455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing an action by way of recoupment, which essentially functions as a defense, will lie where a party possesses an otherwise time-barred ECOA claim
- stating “a creditor may not claim legal reliance on a signature that was illegally required in the first instance”
- stating “a creditor may not claim legal reliance on a signature that was illegally required in the first instance”
- \Claims by way of recoupment are 'never barred by the statute of limitations so long as the main action itself is timely'\
- party could assert time-barred claim by way of recoupment in action by lender to collect on guaranty
- applicant may seek only recoupment damages after limitations period has run
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Neill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.