Mayer v. Interstate Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining why an evasive discovery response does not authorize Rule 37 (d) sanctions
• explaining why an evasive discovery response does not authorize Rule 37 (d) sanctions
• addressing former Code Ann. § 81A-137, the predecessor to OCGA § 9-11-37
• explaining why evasive or incomplete discovery responses do not authorize Rule 37 (d) sanctions and stating that the proper remedy for such answers is for the trial court to order a complete response under Rule 37 (a)
• a trial court may not impose discovery sanctions unless a party has violated a court order regarding discovery or has failed completely to respond to discovery or appear for a deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).