Green v. Snellings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the facts, even though disputed, authorized finding that defendant had been properly served with pleadings on motion to compel discovery
• noting that the facts, even though disputed, authorized finding that defendant had been properly served with pleadings on motion to compel discovery
• “Uniform Superior Court Rule 6.4 (B) does not require the moving party seeking to compel discovery to confer with counsel for the opposing party prior to filing a motion to compel where no discovery responses have been filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).