District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/27/1993
May v. State
Citations
- 623 So. 2d 601
- 1993 WL 324025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is a fundamental right
- stating that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is a fundamental right
- reversing finding of indirect criminal contempt when the juvenile was not afforded due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Threadgill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-10· cited 16×
- Tyler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-15· cited 11×
- WC v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-31· cited 7×
- MW v. LofthiemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-01· cited 6×
- Wiggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-09· cited 1×
- Acevedo v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-21· cited 1×
- Morris v. BussN.D. Florida· 2011-03-07
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-09· cited 124×
- AA v. RolleSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-23· cited 33×
- G.L.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-16· cited 18×
- In Re Petition of Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 15×
- Bray v. RimesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-21· cited 9×
- State v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.