Ninth Circuit· 11/30/2010
Maxwell v. Roe
Citations
- 628 F.3d 486
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24432
- 2010 WL 4925429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that false testimony was material because it came from a “‘make-or-break’ witness for the State” and there was a “paucity of other evidence”
- informant was “the ‘make-or-break witness’ ” and his testi- mony about defendant’s jailhouse confession was the “center- piece of the prosecution’s case”
- “[B]ecause the state court’s decision was ‘based on an unreasonable determination of the facts’ . . . AEDPA deference no longer applies.”
- “The evidence of Storch’s later lies under oath does not establish the nature of his testimony at Maxwell’s trial”
- “[E]ven false evidence presented in good faith . . . hardly comports with fundamental fairness.” (quoting Killian v. Poole, 282 F.3d 1204, 1209 (9th Cir. 2002))
- “The evidence of Storch’s later lies under oath does not establish the nature of his testimony at Maxwell’s trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Paez, Mahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rice v. WhiteSixth Circuit· 2011-10-24· cited 232×
- Ex parte WeinsteinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-01-29· cited 195×
- Sistrunk v. RozumThird Circuit· 2012-03-20· cited 134×
- United States v. WilkesNinth Circuit· 2011-10-19· cited 109×
- Sivak v. HardisonNinth Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 93×
- Jesse Gonzalez v. Robert WongNinth Circuit· 2011-12-07· cited 90×
- United States v. Kenneth OlsenNinth Circuit· 2013-01-08· cited 68×
- Martin Kipp v. Ron DavisNinth Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 67×
- Alan Gimenez v. J. OchoaNinth Circuit· 2016-05-09· cited 55×
- Paul Browning v. Renee BakerNinth Circuit· 2017-09-20· cited 46×
- Robert Ybarra, Jr. v. Timothy FilsonNinth Circuit· 2017-09-01· cited 43×
- Nelson Hernandez v. Kim HollandNinth Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 41×
- Kevin Jones, Jr. v. K. HarringtonNinth Circuit· 2016-07-22· cited 34×
- Hooman Panah v. Kevin ChappellNinth Circuit· 2019-08-21· cited 24×
- Albert Pierre, Sr. v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenFifth Circuit· 2018-05-23· cited 23×
- Cash v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 2012-01-09· cited 14×
- Steven Catlin v. Ronald BroomfieldNinth Circuit· 2024-12-24· cited 13×
- Delaney Marks v. Ronald DavisNinth Circuit· 2024-07-08· cited 11×
- Jensen v. HernandezE.D. California· 2012-03-30· cited 8×
- Joseph Marcy v. Superintendent Phoenix SCIThird Circuit· 2024-07-30· cited 5×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court· 1991-06-24· cited 2,430×
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 1,422×
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 1,388×
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 1,072×
- Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 855×
- Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneNinth Circuit· 2004-05-10· cited 790×
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 661×
- Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court· 2006-01-10· cited 376×
- Billy Russell Clark v. Tim MurphyNinth Circuit· 2003-06-10· cited 368×
- Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonNinth Circuit· 2003-07-10· cited 343×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.